I became a member of Webshots when I first went online in the fall of 2000. It would seem that I did so in the hey day of the Internet and things have slid steadily down hill since. I suppose I couldn't expect everything to remain free as it was back then but oh how the mighty have fallen.
So many little things have fallen by the wayside, such as the fact the Webshots didn't welcome me this morning with a happy birthday message on the home page. When I first joined I was able to customize the page to set how the page displayed on my screen, the features I wanted and in particular the features I didn't want to see. I was able to make Webshots a comprehensive homepage that had everything I needed. It showed me my local weather, world news--not just techie fluff, this day in history--with shortcuts to background information on that news, and advice on the best free software available anywhere.
The pictures available were superb and there wasn't a webshots watermark placed on all of them; even the ones I uploaded to the programme. Plus the best ones weren't reserved for an elite few that paid for premium subscriptions. And there weren't any of those infuriating ads.
Now I have no objection to paying for a service if there is something worthy of my hard-earned cash being provided; but given the present short-comings I'm at the point that I'm seriously considering terminating my daily visit to the page altogether. I can find virtually everything that's available here elsewhere on the web. Of course I also possess a great deal more computer savvy and don't need the likes of Webshots software to display wallpaper on my desktop.
One final comment. I began my baptism into the world of computers with a pivoting screen and as I have grown more sophisticated in my use of computers I find that I do almost everything in Portrait mode, save for a few cranky programmes that refuse to perform properly except in Landscape. One thing that would make me more interested in using Webshots would be the provision of more portrait shots. Obviously, under the circumstances, paying extra for ultra widescreen shots is a non-starter. I realize I may be in the elite few who have discovered the joys of using a computer in portrait mode and that catering to my special concerns may not be in the cards--but having become hooked on viewing the world wide web in this mode I'm spoiled and there's no going back. When my original IBM screen started failing I invested $600 in a ViewSonic Screen--that's a lot of money, but it's still 10% of what my original screen listed for.
One last thing, at least I should tell you that unlike so many websites the code you use does manage to display properly on my screen.
My Blog List
-
-
Paterson6 years ago
-
Brian Adams7 years ago
-
Trinity9 years ago
-
Handle a Dog Attack - wikiHow16 years ago
-
Born on a mixed subsistence farm in rural Lunenburg County, Nova Scotia, Canada. Moved to Ontario in 1967 to attend University at what was then Waterloo Lutheran University and moved to Oakville, Ontario in 1971. Without intending to live up to the name became a letter carrier the following January and have worked for Canada Post ever since. I retired in August of 2008.
Saturday, July 29, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(102)
-
▼
July
(27)
- Heat Wave!
- Birthdays: the price of surviving another year.
- On Birthdays & Other Rants
- A Dirge for the WWW that was
- Dog Days of Summer
- The Gift of Giving
- The system is broke but it's the only system we've...
- Work--the curse of the Drinking Class
- My Personal History with Thunderstorms
- Doctor Zhivago
- Guess the heat is starting to get to me.
- On the radio they're arguing over whether the City...
- Slave to the Clock
- Progress?
- In a Snarky Mood
- Jurassic Disaster
- The Investigator
- Mirvish's Lord of the Rings
- Carnage in the Iliad
- Back to the Stone Age
- What Happened to Family Values?
- How I spent my Long Weekend
- Have Respect for Thunderstorms
- No Bull about Billy Bean
- The Iliad
- Superman?
- Back with avengence
-
▼
July
(27)
No comments:
Post a Comment